Niharika Jain
Niharika Jain is a commerce graduate of Hindu College, University of Delhi. Her previous work includes Egon Zehnder and The Dance Bible.
Read profileBroomees offers domestic help, cooking, babysitting, elderly care, and live-in household help. This page brings together its company overview, service categories, and founder biographies.
Broomees offers options across several household-help categories. See its website for current details.
Explore home servicesNiharika Jain is a commerce graduate of Hindu College, University of Delhi. Her previous work includes Egon Zehnder and The Dance Bible.
Read profileVaibhav Agrawal is a mechanical engineering graduate of Delhi Technological University. His career includes Kearney, Sheroes, Boldrocchi, Kubma, and NanheKadam.
Read profileSaurav Kumar is a mechanical engineering graduate of Delhi Technological University. His previous work includes Boldrocchi and CY Super.
Read profileBroomees offers domestic help and housekeeping services.
Service informationBroomees offers cooks and cooking help.
Service informationBroomees offers babysitting and child-care support.
Service informationThese pages summarize public posts and complaint listings. Each case links to its source.
abhimarx says successive workers for their parents arrived late, left early, used phones during work or did not match the shared profile.
Read case fileJain says local police verification was unavailable in Uttar Pradesh, his ₹8,000 refund was refused, a chargeback was contested, and he later received a ₹14,000 renewal invoice.
Read case fileTaneja says Broomees refused his refund under a policy statement he says was more than 20 clicks into the website and absent from his signed documents.
Read case fileChopra says Broomees had searched for a worker for over a month and that they had waited 15–20 days for a refund after receiving a standard escalation response.
Read case fileIn a complaint-site listing, Rai says she paid an advance for domestic help, had no worker start by day 12, and was denied a refund.
Read case fileChirag says assigned workers lacked the skills expected and repeated requests after moving within Pune did not result in a new placement.
Read case fileContractWest3565 says a house-help worker left the day after placement, describes food-preparation and relationship-manager concerns, and says no service followed.
Read case fileIn a LinkedIn post, Barve says he paid ₹9,000 on 31 March and had no maid by 22 April; he describes follow-ups as delayed or ignored.
Read case fileIn a complaint-site listing, Pattnaik says she was told a worker was named Pooja, then received a call from someone claiming that name.
Read case fileRanjan says a three-month plan produced two nanny profiles with no experience and that his requests for selectable profiles and a refund went unanswered.
Read case fileVeerwani says seven workers were sent over five weeks, including no-shows, role and profile mismatches, and a kitchen safety incident.
Read case fileGupta says she paid about ₹14,000 for an all-rounder service and could not reach customer care or her relationship manager.
Read case fileMicheal says they paid ₹16,000 for a six-month plan and had not received proper service after two months, despite raising concerns with a relationship manager.
Read case filejyotis21 says an annual domestic-help plan cost ₹36,359, placements were brief, and a replacement was withheld pending a worker’s salary payment.
Read case fileDixit says they were told the cook subscription could be used for six months but was not told it was restricted to one city.
Read case fileIn a complaint-site listing, Maurya says she bought a six-month cook subscription and repeatedly followed up about the agreed start date and time.
Read case fileQumonde says they paid ₹7,291.22 for three months, received no proper service or refund, and experienced repeated communication and placement problems.
Read case fileBatra says two maids quit, a promised replacement had not arrived after five days, and he requested a refund.
Read case fileIn her Trustpilot review, Gupta says she paid ₹36,000 for a full-time nanny, found the assigned nanny unsuitable for infant care, and waited 45 days for a promised replacement.
Read case fileChakraborty says Broomees did not know whether his assigned cook would come and was more proactive about selling and renewal than service.
Read case fileSad_Seaworthiness4162 says they did not receive a cook and that Broomees collected ₹50 without providing service.
Read case fileAcharya says they had not received a promised nanny police-verification report after a month of service despite at least ten follow-ups.
Read case fileAwasthi says she was persuaded to subscribe, received no maid or cook and did not receive a refund.
Read case fileTester4089 says a confirmed maid did not arrive, a later worker could not communicate in the requested language, and a promised replacement had not arrived after several days.
Read case fileGautam says 26 maids were sent over six months for a cook service and many could not prepare basic meals or attend consistently.
Read case file